<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://identitymeme.org/archives/2006/12/21/a-cost-analysis-of-windows-vista-content-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://identitymeme.org/archives/2006/12/21/a-cost-analysis-of-windows-vista-content-protection/</link>
	<description>=JeffH's musings on identity, security, protocols, SDOs, and tussles thereof...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: IdentityMeme.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Debate on Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection</title>
		<link>http://identitymeme.org/archives/2006/12/21/a-cost-analysis-of-windows-vista-content-protection/#comment-3787</link>
		<dc:creator>IdentityMeme.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Debate on Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitymeme.org/?p=49#comment-3787</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, I&#8217;m using the term &#8220;debate&#8221; loosely here because it seems to me, given the marshalled evidence, there isn&#8217;t much of a debate to be had, but in any case, Microsoft has responded to Peter Gutmann&#8217;s cost analysis of the DRM subsystems inWindows Vista (of which I&#8217;d written about earlier), and also in system hardware that has anything to do with handling of so-called &#8220;premium content&#8221; (i.e. content encoded onto newly emerging HD-DVD and Blu-Ray discs). Their reply is here..  Windows Vista Content Protection - Twenty Questions (and Answers) http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2007/01/20/windows-vista-content-protection-twenty-questions-and-answers.aspx [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, I&#8217;m using the term &#8220;debate&#8221; loosely here because it seems to me, given the marshalled evidence, there isn&#8217;t much of a debate to be had, but in any case, Microsoft has responded to Peter Gutmann&#8217;s cost analysis of the DRM subsystems inWindows Vista (of which I&#8217;d written about earlier), and also in system hardware that has anything to do with handling of so-called &#8220;premium content&#8221; (i.e. content encoded onto newly emerging HD-DVD and Blu-Ray discs). Their reply is here..  Windows Vista Content Protection - Twenty Questions (and Answers) <a href="http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2007/01/20/windows-vista-content-protection-twenty-questions-and-answers.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2007/01/20/windows-vista-content-protection-twenty-questions-and-answers.aspx</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
